Tuesday, 27 September 2016

Trump 'so pathetic', Satan endorses Clinton

Citing the billionaire's apparent deficiencies in the art of lingual legerdemain, the Prince of Darkness has opted to go with candidate Clinton. "It was fun while it lasted, but let's get real," was how Satan spokesperson Jeffrey Epstein quoted him to the Associated Press yesterday evening, saying his Lord had clearly made up his mind during Trump's closing statement at the evening's presidential debate.

"He said he has many of the attributes we would want in an American president, but was quick to point out that these don't mean squat if you can't close the deal," Epstein said.

Already much earlier in the evening, the Twitter account most closely identified with the Antichrist, @_B._Elle_Z'bub, tweeted out an angry face emoji with the hashtags #sopathetic #deepeight16. The tweet was soon deleted.

The spokesperson added, "I even tried to play devil's advocate, you know, which is complicated under the circumstances. But what a lot of people don't realize – those who don't know him, is that Satan's a real cool guy. So I say to him 'Don't you think he'd have performed much better if he hadn't been here right before air-time getting all coked up with me and [former President Clinton]?' He just laughed that laugh he does and said 'I'm with her.' Classic Devil stuff."

Saturday, 24 September 2016

Enabligatory Behavior

The following meme presents itself as original at this link here.

I don't know if the Facebooker there is the originator of the text, I don't know if the originator of the text is a history teacher, a non-history teacher passing himself off as one, or someone, by implication, playing the part of a non-history teacher passing himself off as one. He sounds like a cereal box history teacher, at any rate.

Forgive me if you think I'm stating the obvious here, but Hitler wasn't elected. "The German people" did not elect Hitler. Period. Moreover, however, the respective backdrops of the Weimar Republic and 21st Century Schizoid America are so vastly different that these analogies are meaningless. Nevertheless, I'll give one set of analogies a go since the subject of the origins of Hitler's rise to power has been alluded to:

The Enabling Act of 1933 is basically The Patriot Act of 2001 with the exception that the latter was more fecklessly enabling by those who played bi-party to it. Prior to that, Paul von Hindenburg's appointment of Hitler to the German Chancellory is the Supreme Court of the United States' appointment of George W. Bush to the US Presidency, except in the latter case Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. is more aptly analogous to von Hindenburg, insofar as it relates to with enabligatory behavior.

Wikipedia would be this history teacher's friend, apparently. The party that nominated Donald Trump has pushed the issues named a lot over the last several decades, and it's not the first time Americans are being fed this analogy. The difference is, it had always been cryto-warnings commensurate with the crypto-fascist policies the party ran on.

Now the entire apparatus is so corrupt that only the rhetoric is different – with minor exceptions: Terrorism. It's the lie that keeps on feeding the machine that the two major candidates are running on. And while the word communism doesn't drip from the Democrats' mouths, they have completely co-opted the national security state buzz-terminology (and policy), and are actively trying to foment paranoia of Russia right out of McCarthy's playbook. Of course, this only because the Yanks want Syria, as if Libya & Iraq aren't all they can handle.

__


At the following link, the author misattributes something to a Facebook post by a former major league hardballer because what he says is apparently heinous enough that the misattributor can get away with making it sound like the ex-pitcher tossed it from thin air. It begins with the headline Curt Schilling: Those accused of terrorism should be stripped of rights and executed.

Among the offense expressed in the comments section, I didn't notice anyone mention that that is precisely — and I do mean precisely — current US foreign policy, which has in fact already laid the groundwork for it to be domestic policy as well.

Let us also not forget that the current administration has carried out a record number of deportations and has prosecuted a record number of whistle blowers. It might be amusing that among other things, Republicans loyalists, or whoever, have compared Obama to Hitler. Gee, I wonder who that benefits...

Monday, 19 September 2016

Reunited: How the West was One

You might recall from last year's hoo-hah that the whirled's had a full generation to digest the reunification of the German state. Let's take a look at the fascinating colour schemes as seen this morning compared to how it looked for the fifty years the sides were split. On the left you see the results of yesterday's election- on the right, the city as parcelled out by the confederacy of belligerents at the Potsdam Conference:

       Berlin Election 2016                         Berlin 1949-1989

As H. Ross Perot might say, "Innerestin' idn't it?" For most, the obvious has long been that the old east-west west-east divide maintains an apparently solid mix of loyalty toward the respective parties of traditional influence. Well, I mean traditional insofar as peoples who were formed out of the decision to choose one kind of government over another that lasted a period of two generations, in weak contrast to the generation in time that followed during which the putative opportunity to rid oneself of the supposed shackles of socialist indoctrination played out in all its glory glory hallelujah. Of course the second part of that last sentence was written from the perspective of a westerner, not because I am a westerner, born & bred, but because the West are the ones who ultimately conquered the city with $oft power ('First we take Manhattan', anyone?).

The more striking reflection is how the western sectors districts vote, with the former British controlled areas going mostly SPD and the French and US territories trending Christian Democrat. As an aside, it's interesting that the blue chosen by the keep your stinking refugees AfD matches nicely with the shade someone selected over't the Wiccapaedia for the American sector.

I suppose in order to accurately analyze these tendencies, one should look at the literal outliers in finer detail:

First there's the oft mentioned fact that no-apologies ultra-right wingers do well in the former states of the GDR, but like so many places where this is the case, it's a lot more obvious the more rural and/or 'burbier you go, where they encounter multiculturalism mainly through the distant deigning of demagoguery. This is evident when you visit the concrete reaches of Buch, Marzahn, and Hellersdorf.

That black upholstered armchair perched upon the last eastern peninsula is another story altogether: Mahlsdorf. The biggest difference occurred when the district it's in, Mahrzahn-Hellersdorf lost PDS candidate Gregor Gysi, who in 2001 had garnered half the vote. The CDU had already been running a pretty strong second to Gysi's PDS, at 27 percent. However, in 2006 without Gysi, and with the PDS already dubbed Die Linke on the ballot (as part of the official fusion with the WASG that would take place the following year), they only managed 23 percent. That big a drop within one election cycle must be attributable to the absence of the face of the party during a contentious name change.

Still, part of the CDU's ongoing ownership of Mahlsdorf in spite of poor showings in the rest of the district probably mirrors that of anywhere you see black: people believe they own their shit because they're entitled to it and want it to stay that way (as opposed to the baby blue constituencies' knowing they don't own shit but wanna keep whatever it is they think they got out of the hands of Arabs, Persians, and Africans specifically as a good place to start).

This'd be a little too like the lazy demographic analysis of social scientistic punditry if I didn't mention the more detailed reality regarding the latter group's encompassing, as well, those opposed to big money war profiteering. It's just that you almost only ever hear them bitching about the result and not the cause. This they have in common with adherents to almost all parties' factions of loyalty.

But it is in fact Die Linke — running along the former East all dressed in pink — who have consistently taken aim at capital's war machine and associated investment class. With the exception of Sahra Wagenknecht's mentioning that "of course there's a upper limit to how many refugees a state can handle" and that an honest government might want to include that as part of the discussion — which might have deflated a key part of the AfD's argument, which was part of her point — they have only urged immediate acceptance of asylum seekers from all corners.

As long as I'm tying former districts of the GDR to The Left, I should mention again that in about two-thirds of the time it took East German border guards to snipe 200 would-be escapees, the Yanks murdered a million Vietnamese. I'm sure both estimates are kind. The GDR took in about 10,000 Vietnamese emigres by the mid-seventies, 60,000 by the time the Wall came down.

Speakin' o' the Wall
The Potsdam Conference established the partitioning into US, British, French, and Soviet zones seen in the map above right. Coincidentally, it's at the lyrical heart of the death strip at Potsdamer Platz (the place named for the road to Potsdam) where the codified corners converge. After the fall, these adjacent spots became the property of Daimler-Benz, Sony, Otto Beisheim, and ABB/Roland Ernst Städtebau.

Daimler-Benz had snagged the largest parcel for so cheap that the stink it caused led to the European Commission's ordering an additional payment of 34 million Deutschmarks to the Land of Berlin mere months after the initial sale had been completed.

Otto Beisheim was a former Nazi stormtrooper. Did you know that before the war they were the Freikorps (having been renamed after the first war)? Beisheim erected a center in his name, which housed the Ritz Carlton and the Marriott International. Imagine building a hotel tower complex with your own name on it.

Sony built the biggest monstrosity on their place and were rewarded another 4,500 m² by the Berlin Senate as remuneration for having to relocate some of their completed structure, even though it was due to their having disregarded conditions of the contract.

All I can find about Roland Ernst Städtebau is this article in German from 2011 regarding his arrest on suspicion of graft and fraud.

For Berlin, the massive construction on Potsdamer Platz was their first use of public-private partnerships to get shit done. The Berlin Senate made a show pony out of its design competition, while the players they brought thru the back door would subsequently use threats to get their way around perceived limitations. It was win-win for somebody — in the same way that CETA and TTIP and TISA and whatever subsequent names they may carry will be a win-win for corporations jacked-up on autonomy.

In other words: the politicians will always pretend they don't know they're being played as a sure way to hide the fact that they are playing along. That Corporate is seeking to make its authority official should be instructive. It was, already, to the at least 30,000 who took to the streets Saturday in Berlin. But that won't likely change the outlook of the new senior partner in any coming coalition, the SPD, whose functionaries have, in op eds and on polit-talk shows, newspoken the necessity of precisely these kinds of agreements to any civilized society.

Now the Greens say they are against CETA as well. But if you know the German Greens, well, like I've said, coalition building makes for erratic bedfellowing – the subconsci-equences of which might help explain the last odd trend in the electoral map above: The Greens in the middle. They seem to have the strongest constituency in the area where most of the green has made way for concrete.

Speakin' o' the Wahl
So how 'bout the numbers? Well, I am proud to say that at least in one ward in my district the satirical party Die PARTEI beat out the AfD for second to last place. Unfortunately in the ward west of me AfD got just about 11 percent. With any luck, they'll go the way of the Pirates, who made a big splash last time round but have all but disappeared.

The Berlin breakdown looks like this:


As predicted, the SPD benefited in spite of their bleeding a seat more than the CDU. Unexpectedly, the Left edged out the Greens – but their seat numbers will be the same. Even in light of this, however, I would urge Die Linke not to build a coalition with the SPD and Grüne. There goes the way of losing everything they won here. If they demur, the Greens will go willing with the fake Reds and form a coalition with the CDU just so they can have an office in the administration. And like I said, there goes the way of losing everything they won. But they've been doing that cyclically for thirty years now.

Because the only coalition coming from this will have to be more than two parties, the Berliner Zeitung is declaring the authority of the Volksparteien for toast. I think they're smearing butter.

In closing, here's the best shot I could get of Die PARTEI walking the opposite direction through the demo Saturday, followed by a hover image version of the maps above:

Those who walk in the other direction are STUUPID  -and-  KETA instead of CETA

Move your cursor over the image for extra fun.